Words Matter: The Power of Language in Respecting People with Disabilities

By: Kashaf Alvi  Includovate’s Ambassador 

Language shapes our reality. The words we choose have the power to build bridges or create barriers, to uplift or to diminish. This is especially true when it comes to how we speak about people with disabilities. Phrases like “falling on deaf ears” or “wheelchair-bound” may seem harmless to some, but they carry a heavy weight of stigma and negativity that can be deeply hurtful and dehumanizing. It’s time we reexamine our language and make conscious choices that reflect respect, dignity, and inclusivity—not just in everyday conversation but also in the dictionaries that shape our understanding of language.

Why Words Matter

Consider the phrase “falling on deaf ears.” It implies ignorance or stubbornness and equates deafness with an inability to listen or understand. This is not only inaccurate but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes about people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Similarly, the term “wheelchair-bound” suggests that a wheelchair is a form of confinement, rather than a tool of mobility and independence. For many, a wheelchair is a means of freedom, allowing them to navigate the world on their terms. Describing someone as “wheelchair-bound” reduces their identity to their disability and overlooks the agency and autonomy they have in their lives.

Harmful Phrases and Their Impact

“Turning a blind eye”

Implication: Suggests that blindness equates to willful ignorance or negligence.

Alternative: “Ignoring the issue” or “Overlooking the problem.”

“Lame excuse”

Implication: Uses “lame,” a term historically associated with physical disability, to mean weak or unconvincing.

Alternative: “Weak excuse” or “Unconvincing excuse.”

“Crippled by fear”

Implication: Associates being physically disabled (crippled) with being overwhelmed or paralyzed by emotion.

Alternative: “Overwhelmed by fear” or “Paralyzed by fear.”

“Blind leading the blind”

Implication: Implies incompetence and lack of direction, reinforcing negative stereotypes about blind individuals.

Alternative: “Inexperienced leading the inexperienced.”

“Crazy” or “Insane”

Implication: Uses mental illness terms to describe something wild, unpredictable, or illogical.

Alternative: “Ridiculous,” “Unbelievable,” or “Outrageous.”

“Schizo” or “Schizophrenic” when describing erratic behavior

Implication: Misuses a medical diagnosis to describe unpredictable behavior, which can stigmatize people with schizophrenia.

Alternative: “Erratic,” “Unpredictable,” or “Inconsistent.”

“Midget”

Implication: An outdated and offensive term used to describe someone with dwarfism.

Alternative: “Person with dwarfism” or “Little person.”

“Retarded”

Implication: Historically used in a medical context, but now considered highly offensive when used to describe someone as foolish or slow.

Alternative: “Intellectually disabled,” “Person with developmental disabilities,” or avoid using it as an insult altogether.

“Psycho”

Implication: Used to describe someone acting wildly or irrationally, it stigmatizes mental health conditions.

Alternative: “Unstable,” “Erratic,” or “Unpredictable.”

“Dumb”

Implication: Historically referred to someone who could not speak, but commonly used to mean unintelligent.

Alternative: “Speechless” (if literal) or “Uninformed,” “Unwise” (if meant as unintelligent).

More Respectful Alternatives

“Autistic person” vs. “Person with autism”: While person-first language is often preferred (“person with autism”), some communities, such as many in the autistic community, prefer identity-first language (“autistic person”). It’s important to ask and respect individual preferences.

“Learning disability” vs. “Learning difficulty”: The term “learning disability” is often used in the U.S., while “learning difficulty” is more common in the U.K. It’s crucial to use the term preferred by the person or the community you are addressing.

“Seizure disorder” vs. “Epileptic”: “Seizure disorder” focuses on the condition rather than defining the person by it.

The Impact of Inclusive Language

Choosing inclusive language is not about being politically correct; it’s about acknowledging and respecting the lived experiences of people with disabilities. It’s about creating a world where everyone feels valued and included. When we use respectful language, we break down barriers and open doors to understanding, empathy, and acceptance.

Real-World Change

Look at the stories of individuals like Haben Girma, the first deafblind graduate of Harvard Law School, who navigates her world with the help of technology and interpreters, not as someone “bound” by her disabilities but as a pioneer and advocate. Or consider the accomplishments of athletes like Tatyana McFadden, a wheelchair racer who has won numerous Paralympic medals. Describing her as “wheelchair-bound” would completely disregard her strength, determination, and achievements.

Dictionaries Must Evolve

Dictionaries play a crucial role in shaping our understanding of language. They are authoritative sources that influence how words are used and understood in society. Therefore, it is imperative that dictionaries update their entries to reflect more respectful and inclusive language. Outdated and harmful phrases should be replaced with alternatives that honor the dignity and humanity of people with disabilities. This change not only educates the public but also reinforces the importance of using language that builds a more inclusive and compassionate world.

We must challenge ourselves to rethink and reshape our language. This means educating ourselves about the preferred terminology and being open to correction when we make mistakes. It means listening to people with disabilities and respecting their voices and choices in how they wish to be described.

Let’s commit to using language that honors the dignity and diversity of all individuals. By doing so, we not only show respect but also contribute to a more inclusive and compassionate society. Words are powerful. Let’s use them to empower and uplift. 




 

Kashaf Alvi is Pakistani deaf writer and activist who advocates for the deaf community. At just 20-years-old, Kashaf has already made a lasting mark as Pakistan’s first deaf-published author and the youngest deaf author globally. His journey of resilience, advocacy, and literary accomplishment aligns seamlessly with our mission at Includovate – to empower marginalised communities and promote inclusiveness on a global scale.  He is recipient of the Pride of Pakistan recognition, Brand Ambassador of Includovate, Ambassador of Pakistan Health Parliament, disability & peace advocate, published author, columnist, short film writer, Microsoft Certified Associate and a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Shaper community. Kashaf’s insightful perspectives and dedication to advocating for the rights of individuals with disabilities resonate deeply with us. His work as a disability and peace advocate, along with his numerous accolades including being a recipient of the Pride of Pakistan recognition, exemplifies his commitment to fostering a more inclusive society. 

 

 

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content